Group Assignment: Read "Pedagogy of Poverty Versus Good Teaching" - Martin Haberman
Presentation: 5-8 min
Begin to critically analyze the text (construct/build meaning).
You are not summarizing the essay to present.
Pick something specific within the article that you wish to discuss as a group.
You have the autonomy of presenting anyway you want
Medium:
- If you are using multi-media, please bring device to use in class that can be used with projector(ex. laptop computer)
- If using power point, save in USB drive
- If using YouTube, keep to minimal
- If handing out material, please make sufficient copies
Rubric:
- Everyone must participate
- I will be providing FEEDBACK for each individual group
- ORIGINALITY of presentation will be taken into account
- Looking for thoughtful ANALYSIS and interpretations of the TEXT (Article)
ESSAY:
- Due Next Class meeting
- 3 pages / You can split this up between group members
- I don't want three seperate response papers
- I want a unified paper / cohesive / organized essay
- Construct meaning, use your writing experience, use discussions in class to guide your paper
- Use academic related information that we have used in class if you want (Pedagogy/Metacognition//Standardized Testing/Rhetorical Reading)
group 6 you all's presentation was really good!
ReplyDeleteGroup 5 did a fairly good job on their presentation of The Pedagogy of Poverty versus Good Teaching.
ReplyDeletegroup 5- y'all kept it short, i liked that.
ReplyDeleteGroup 6: the slides where fancy and thanks for the candy.
ReplyDeleteGroup 6. I liked the presentation. You guys were really creative for putting out the important side notes on the candies!
ReplyDeletegroup 6 very good presntation very organized
ReplyDeletegroup 3 - need to work together as a group and don't be shy, speak up, were all here to learn not laugh.
ReplyDeleteGroup 6: I really liked the presentation!! They were super creative and very professional..
ReplyDeleteGroup 3 didn't seem too prepared for the presentation they were presenting. Overall it was okay.
ReplyDeleteGroup 5: short but very informative!!
ReplyDeletegroup 6 did really good
ReplyDeletegroup 3- did a good job.
ReplyDeleteGroup 3. Kept it real old school which i liked because it was different. You guys just needed to speak up a bit louder.
ReplyDeletegroup 3 did okay on the information and little unprepared
ReplyDeleteeneliza and Jennifer and danny
ReplyDeleteTheir presentation was very good,and they were very prepared. Good job with the game at the end.
great job guys!
Group 2. I liked the game you guys presented it was really fun!
ReplyDeleteeneliza and Jennifer and danny
ReplyDeletegood summarization and the game was pretty cool
alisa group did veryy good o their presentation
ReplyDeleteGroup 2 did a good job with their power point.
ReplyDeletejulie group did really good on information and group work was okay
ReplyDeleteGroup 1. Great presentation! Made a whole lot of sense really liked it.
ReplyDeleteGroup 2: good presentation!
ReplyDeleteGroup 4. Really good discussion!
ReplyDeleteGroup 5 did a moderate job on their presentation.
ReplyDeleteGroup 4 did a good job on explaining but could of been more louder.
Group 2 did an excellent job with their presentation.
Group 1 did an excellent job with their presentation because it was very informative.
Group 3 did a good job because it was very informative and had a lot of discussion in it. -Alfredo
mariecarmen, jazmine and jeorge pretty good overall and good talk over certain topic.
ReplyDeleteAlfredo/Leeanna/Ashley
ReplyDelete• Very well prepared
• Thank you for defining “Pedagogy”
• Prezi was very “to the point” informational
• Good summarization of material
• Very creative with your material
• Needed probably a bit more analysis on specific topic
• Overall I think rather than summarizing material presentation needed to be more specific and analysis based, consider this for your paper
Israel / Donovan / Ramiro
• Good summarization of material
• How are teachers supposed to act? Elaboration
• What sums up good and bad teaching Good discussion
• Needed to be more specific in topic
• Fairly brief presentation 5-8 min?
• Presentation wise / Face audience/ Don’t just read off slides
• Elaboration on material would have been helpful
• Overall I think rather than summarizing material presentation needed to be more specific and analysis based, consider this for your paper
Alondra / Carmen / Cassy
• Presentation was disorganized
• I’m not sure if your group actually got together to discuss article
• Needed to be more prepared with information that you wanted to present
• All of this makes for an effective presentation
• You lost audience with time it took you to write info on the board
• Higher Class / Lower Class Not as mature?
• This would have made for a good discussion as another student in class quickly pointed something out in your presentation
• Overall I think rather than summarizing material presentation needed to be more specific and analysis based, consider this for your paper
Eneliza / Jennifer / Danny
• Nice definitions
• Good summarization of material
• Not much difference between poverty/good teaching This would have been a good discussion
• Overall I think rather than summarizing material presentation needed to be more specific and analysis based, consider this for your paper
• I think the game was pretty cool
• Thanks for the candy
Justin / Julie / Sal
• Poor / Class system socioeconomic factors Sounds like you were questioning this? What do you think? Might have been a good discussion
• Control factor was specific information in the article, good job. More of this
• Poverty has a huge impact
• Overall I think your group was more specific and analysis based, but you should have discussed this with class
Yasmin / Maricarmen / George
• Probably needed to be more prepared
• Teachers don’t care They’re going to get paid anyways
• Discussion was effective
• Discuss more of the essay according to Habberman
• I hope the discussion translated into the essay
• MONEY: Central Idea
• Take the easy way out? Sounds like a good essay title